The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act

The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act — codified at California Civil Code §§ 1790–1795.8 — is the statute commonly known as the California Lemon Law. Enacted in 1970 and expanded by the Tanner Consumer Protection Act in 1982, Song-Beverly governs the rights of buyers and lessees of consumer goods sold in California with an express written warranty. Its motor-vehicle provisions (§ 1793.2 and § 1793.22) require manufacturers to repurchase, replace, or refund vehicles they cannot repair within a reasonable number of attempts, and § 1794 shifts attorney’s fees onto the manufacturer when the consumer prevails.

 

 

Origins and Legislative History

The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act was authored by California State Senator Alfred Song and Assemblyman Robert Beverly and signed into law in 1970. It predates the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act by five years and was, at the time, the most ambitious state consumer-warranty statute in the country.

In 1982 the Legislature passed the Tanner Consumer Protection Act, which added the rebuttable lemon presumption now codified at Civil Code § 1793.22. The Tanner amendments introduced the now-familiar criteria — four repair attempts, two attempts for serious safety defects, or 30 cumulative days out of service within 18 months / 18,000 miles. See the lemon law presumption for the full mechanics.

The statute has been amended multiple times since to extend coverage to leased vehicles (1791.1), used vehicles sold with manufacturer warranties, and small commercial vehicles under 10,000 lbs GVWR.

 

 

Scope: What Song-Beverly Covers

Song-Beverly is a consumer goods statute. It applies to any “consumer good” — defined in § 1791(a) — sold or leased in California with a manufacturer’s written warranty. While it covers appliances, electronics, and other durable goods, its specialized vehicle provisions are the heart of California Lemon Law practice.

Vehicle coverage includes:

 

 

Key Statutory Sections

§ 1791 — Definitions
Defines “consumer good,” “buyer,” “manufacturer,” “distributor,” “retailer,” and related terms. The definitions section determines who has standing and who is liable.
§ 1791.1 — Implied warranty of merchantability
Codifies the implied warranty of merchantability for consumer goods sold in California. Cannot be waived for new goods sold at retail.
§ 1793.2 — Manufacturer’s repair obligations
The core repair-and-replace provision. Requires manufacturers to maintain service facilities, replace or repurchase vehicles that cannot be repaired within a reasonable number of attempts, and provides for replacement and restitution remedies. The most-cited section in California lemon law litigation.
§ 1793.22 — Tanner Consumer Protection Act: lemon presumption
The 1982 amendment that created the rebuttable lemon presumption. Sets the four-attempt / two-attempt / 30-day thresholds within 18 months or 18,000 miles. Full explanation →
§ 1794 — Remedies for buyer
The remedies and fee-shifting section.
§ 1795.4 — Vehicle leases
Extends statute to leased vehicles; defines “lessee” and remedies available.
§ 1795.5 — Used motor vehicles
Applies Song-Beverly to used vehicles sold with manufacturer or dealer written warranty.

 

 

Why Song-Beverly Is the Strongest State Lemon Law

Three features make Song-Beverly the strongest consumer-warranty statute in the United States:

  1. Fee-shifting under § 1794(d). The manufacturer pays the prevailing consumer’s attorney’s fees. Most states do not have this; the few that do cap fees or condition them on prior offers. California’s fee-shifting is unconditional, which is why competent representation is available to every California consumer.
  2. Civil penalty under § 1794(c). Doubles damages for willful violations. The threat of doubled exposure dramatically reduces a manufacturer’s incentive to stonewall.
  3. Broad coverage of used and leased vehicles. Many state lemon laws cover only new vehicles within tight mileage limits. Song-Beverly extends to any vehicle still under the original manufacturer’s warranty, including used purchases and lease takeovers.

 

 

Song-Beverly Compared to Federal Magnuson-Moss

The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act overlaps with Song-Beverly but is generally weaker for California consumers. Experienced California lemon law attorneys plead both because Magnuson-Moss provides federal jurisdiction as an alternative venue and incorporates state implied-warranty law for written-warranty cases. Where Song-Beverly applies, it is almost always the dominant claim.

 

 

How Song-Beverly Claims Are Filed

The claim mechanics are explained in the dedicated process pages:

 

 

Free Song-Beverly Case Review

A McMillan Law Group attorney will tell you whether your facts support a Song-Beverly claim. Free, statewide, no fee unless we win.

Start your free case review →

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act?

It is California’s consumer-warranty statute, codified at Civil Code §§ 1790–1795.8, and the formal name for the California Lemon Law. It governs the rights of buyers and lessees of consumer goods — including motor vehicles — sold with a manufacturer’s written warranty.

When was Song-Beverly enacted?

1970, authored by Senator Alfred Song and Assemblyman Robert Beverly. Substantially expanded by the Tanner Consumer Protection Act in 1982, which added the rebuttable lemon presumption.

What does Song-Beverly cover beyond cars?

All consumer goods sold in California with an express written warranty — appliances, electronics, durable goods. The motor-vehicle provisions (§§ 1793.2 and 1793.22) are the most-litigated.

Can a manufacturer disclaim Song-Beverly?

No. The Act’s protections cannot be waived by contract for new consumer goods sold at retail. Manufacturer attempts to disclaim implied warranties are limited and tightly regulated under § 1792.

 

 

About the Author

Julian McMillan is the founder of McMillan Law Group and a California lemon law attorney with over 25 years of legal experience, having represented San Diego consumers since 2000. He has been named a Thomson Reuters Super Lawyer twelve consecutive years (2014–2025), recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as a Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Lawyer, and listed in San Diego Magazine’s Top Attorneys in San Diego (2016–2025) and America’s Most Honored Professionals (2018–2025).

Julian holds an L.L.M. from the University of San Diego School of Law, an L.L.M. from Nottingham Law School (England), an L.L.B. with Distinction from the University of Exeter (England), and a B.A. (Honors) from the University of Victoria (Canada). He is admitted to the California Bar, the U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Central, and Northern Districts of California, and the Supreme Court of England and Wales. Before founding McMillan Law Group he practiced at DLA Piper (San Diego) and Ashurst Morris Crisp (London).

McMillan Law Group · 4655 Cass St, San Diego, CA 92109 · +1 619-795-9430 · Statutory citations on this site link to leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.